Amy M. Davis

Personal Injury Litigation - Plaintiffs

3.0 (1 reviews)

Indianapolis, Indiana

2+ years experience

Updated: Jan 22, 2026

Contact Information

317-428-2082

https://indyinjury.law/about/

2123 North Meridian Street Indianapolis IN US

Create an account to contact this attorney

Claim this profile

Are you this attorney? Claim or manage this listing by signing in or creating an attorney account.

Attorney Login Claim Profile

Bio

M. Davis provides comprehensive Personal Injury Litigation - Plaintiffs legal services to Indiana clients. Over the course of over 1 years, M. Davis has handled diverse Personal Injury Litigation - Plaintiffs matters. M. Davis is committed to providing personalized attention and strategic counsel to each client. Based in Indiana, M. Davis offers experienced counsel and strong representation.

Local Legal Snapshot

Jurisdiction

Indiana

State Capital

Indianapolis

Highest Court

Indiana Supreme Court

Bar Association

Indiana State Bar Association

Typical Consultation

Free-$150

Typical Hourly Range

Often contingency-based

Fee Model Notes

Many personal injury matters are handled on contingency, often around 25%-40% of recovery.

Estimates vary by market, complexity, urgency, and attorney experience.

Practice Areas

Personal Injury Litigation - Plaintiffs

Awards & Recognition

Recognized: Personal Injury Litigation - Plaintiffs

Recognized in Best Lawyers since 2023

Education

Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law, J.D., graduated 2010

Connect

LinkedIn Twitter Facebook

Get Directions on Google Maps

Reviews

Nancy Hill

3 months ago

Competent handling of my car accident case

I hired Amy Davis after a rear-end collision left me with significant whiplash and medical bills. Her recognition in personal injury litigation was a key factor in my decision. She was clearly knowledgeable about Indiana law and the process, having graduated from McKinney School of Law, and she secured a fair settlement that covered my expenses. However, the experience felt somewhat transactional. Communication was functional but not proactive; I often had to follow up for updates, and responses sometimes took several days. While her two years of general practice experience showed in her competent case management, I sometimes felt like just another file. She did the job adequately and got the result, but the client experience lacked the personal touch and consistent communication I was hoping for from an attorney.