Cryptocurrency
Create an account to contact this attorney
Are you this attorney? Claim or manage this listing by signing in or creating an attorney account.
Andy provides strategic and practical counseling to Web3.0 technology companies, with a focus on blockchain and complex open system designs. Andy is the co-inventor of many of the decentralized structures and models that are now utilized industrywide and serves as a strategic thought partner to top blockchain projects from around the world.Andy has extensive experience with a wide variety of Web3.0 designs and transactions, including: Airdrops Centralized and decentralized cryptocurrency designs Centralized and decentralized digital asset exchanges Cryptocurrency presales DAOs, including decentralized governance, tax optimization and securities compliance DeFi model design and implementation Fractionalization and digitization of traditional assets Gaming platforms integrating governance tokens, consumables and other NFT assets Mergers and acquisitions involving digital assets and decentralized models Metaverses Token generation events Venture financing structures that integrate token exposure Contact info:206-389-4552aalbertson@fenwick.com Click here to visit website
Jurisdiction
Washington
State Capital
Olympia
Highest Court
Washington Supreme Court
Bar Association
Washington State Bar Association
Typical Consultation
$150-$300
Typical Hourly Range
$250-$450/hr
Fee Model Notes
Hourly or flat-fee billing is common.
Estimates vary by market, complexity, urgency, and attorney experience.
Timothy Anderson
Andy Albertson's deep understanding of blockchain and decentralized systems is undeniable. We engaged him to draft the foundational tokenomics and governance framework for our new DAO. His strategic advice on complex open system design was valuable, and his background as a co-inventor of decentralized structures gave us confidence in his technical grasp. The final legal architecture was solid. However, our experience was mixed. While he is clearly competent, his communication was sometimes sporadic, with significant wait times for email responses that left us uncertain on project timelines. For straightforward Web3.0 company formation, he's a capable choice, but for clients who need frequent touchpoints and proactive updates, expectations should be managed. His work is good, but the client service aspect felt just adequate.