Class Action Litigation Competition / Antitrust Law Corporate and Commercial Litigation
Create an account to contact this attorney
Are you this attorney? Claim or manage this listing by signing in or creating an attorney account.
As a Class Action Litigation Competition / Antitrust Law Corporate and Commercial Litigation attorney, Eric C. Lefebvre has been serving the United States for nearly a decade. Eric C. Lefebvre's practice spans nearly a decade, focusing on achieving favorable outcomes in Class Action Litigation Competition / Antitrust Law Corporate and Commercial Litigation. Eric C. Lefebvre is associated with Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP in the United States. Eric C. Lefebvre takes a client-focused approach, ensuring individuals understand their legal options. C. Lefebvre maintains active licensure in the United States and stays current with legal developments.
Typical Consultation
$200-$450
Typical Hourly Range
$300-$650/hr
Fee Model Notes
Business and employment matters often involve hourly billing with optional project-based retainers.
Estimates vary by market, complexity, urgency, and attorney experience.
Recognized in Best Lawyers since 2020
Pamela Mitchell
I engaged Eric C. Lefebvre at Norton Rose Fulbright regarding a potential antitrust issue our mid-sized company faced with a supplier's exclusive dealing arrangements. His recognized expertise in Competition/Antitrust Law was immediately apparent. During our initial consultation, he demonstrated a clear, analytical grasp of the relevant market factors and provided a solid, risk-averse strategy. His background in corporate and commercial litigation gave me confidence in his ability to handle the procedural aspects should the matter escalate. However, the experience was not without its frustrations. While the substantive work on our preliminary legal assessment was thorough, there were noticeable delays in receiving updates. Responses to emails often took several business days, and it sometimes felt like we had to prompt his team for status reports. For a firm of this caliber, I expected more proactive communication. His competence is undeniable, especially for the nuanced analysis required in antitrust, and his recognition in the field is well-earned. Ultimately, the legal advice was sound and helped us avoid a costly dispute, but the client service experience felt merely adequate. For straightforward matters requiring deep expertise, he is a good choice, but be prepared to manage the communication timeline actively.
Corporate and Commercial Litigation Defamation and Media Law Professional Malpractice Law