Tina Sciocchetti

Criminal Defense: White-Collar Qui Tam Law

3.0 (1 reviews)

New York, New York

2+ years experience

Updated: Jan 03, 2026

Contact Information

617-345-1000

https://www.nixonpeabody.com/en/team/sciocchetti-tina

677 Broadway, 10th Floor Albany NY US

Create an account to contact this attorney

Claim this profile

Are you this attorney? Claim or manage this listing by signing in or creating an attorney account.

Attorney Login Claim Profile

Bio

Tina Sciocchetti has established a strong reputation as a Criminal Defense: White-Collar Qui Tam Law lawyer in New York. With 2 years serving clients, Tina Sciocchetti has developed proven strategies for Criminal Defense: White-Collar Qui Tam Law matters. Sciocchetti is known for meticulous case preparation and strong advocacy on behalf of clients. Sciocchetti believes in building strong attorney-client relationships based on trust and results. Tina Sciocchetti serves New York with a commitment to professional advocacy and client success.

Local Legal Snapshot

Jurisdiction

New York

State Capital

Albany

Highest Court

New York Court of Appeals

Bar Association

New York State Bar Association

Typical Consultation

$150-$350

Typical Hourly Range

$250-$600/hr

Fee Model Notes

Criminal defense matters are commonly billed flat-fee for defined phases or hourly for complex litigation.

Estimates vary by market, complexity, urgency, and attorney experience.

Practice Areas

Criminal Defense: White-Collar Qui Tam Law

Awards & Recognition

Recognized: Criminal Defense: White-Collar
Recognized: Qui Tam Law
Practice Area: Criminal Defense: General Practice
Practice Area: Privacy and Data Security Law

Recognized in Best Lawyers since 2023

Education

Northwestern University, J.D., graduated 2011

Get Directions on Google Maps

Reviews

Timothy Flores

4 months ago

Competent on the case, but communication was inconsistent

I engaged Tina Sciocchetti at Nixon Peabody for a sensitive internal investigation matter with potential qui tam implications. Her background in white-collar defense and her specific recognition in that area were primary reasons for my choice. Tina demonstrated clear competence in navigating the complex legal landscape; her analysis of the statutes and her strategic approach to our initial fact-finding were sound and professional. However, the experience was mixed. While she is undoubtedly knowledgeable, there were periods where communication lagged significantly, making it difficult to get timely updates. For a matter requiring careful pacing, this created some unnecessary anxiety. Her two years of focused experience showed in her legal work, but the client service aspect felt like it was still developing. She successfully guided the matter to a resolution, but the process could have been smoother with more consistent dialogue.